Hukum Negatif

Pakar Usul Judul RUU Perampasan Aset Jadi Penyitaan, PDIP: Kurang Seram

Rabu, 9 September 2026, 14:13 WIB Sumber: DetikNews

Ukuran:

Pakar UII Yogyakarta Mudzzakir mengusulkan perubahan nomenklatur RUU Perampasan Aset menjadi RUU Penyitaan Aset karena istilah perampasan merupakan keputusan hakim, bukan tindakan penyidik. Anggota Komisi III DPR Safaruddin menolak usul tersebut dan menilai istilah perampasan serta penyitaan sudah berbeda secara substansi. Safaruddin justru khawatir judul RUU akan kehilangan efek jika diubah menjadi penyitaan atau pemulihan aset.

Poin-Poin Utama

Pakar UII Yogyakarta Mudzzakir proposed renaming RUU Perampasan Aset to RUU Penyitaan Aset.
Mudzzakir's reasoning: seizure (penyitaan) occurs during investigation stage, while confiscation (perampasan) is a court ruling.
Mudzzakir stated the term 'perampasan' is only uttered by a judge when facing assets.
DPR Commission III member Safaruddin rejected the proposed nomenclature change.
Safaruddin argued seizure belongs to investigators, confiscation belongs to judges' decisions.
Safaruddin stated the current law title is RUU Tindak Pidana Perampasan Aset.
Safaruddin noted most activities in the law still occur during the investigation stage.
Safaruddin opposed the change because he believes a 'scary' title is necessary.
Safaruddin suggested alternative names like asset recovery (pemulihan aset) would be less intimidating.
The discussion took place during a meeting with Komisi III DPR at Senayan, Jakarta.
The meeting occurred on Wednesday, 9 September 2026.
Mudzzakir expressed concern that the new meaning of confiscation by investigators differs from court-ordered confiscation.
Safaruddin questioned whether changing the title is possible during the discussion.